Legal complaint, Barker v. FitzSimons et al., paragraph 15 and verification (15 July 1890)
Book 1, Page 177 ·1890
Transcription
A typewritten page closing the body of the complaint at the top, followed by an ink signature, then a typewritten oath of verification with two ink signatures and a small drawn seal at lower left.
Conclusion of complaint
for the judgment of this Court, to the end that after fully accounting as Executor and otherwise under these proceedings, he may be fully discharged from all accounting to said Defendants and each of them.
15th: Plaintiff alleges, that Defendant Joe Joiner is not entitled to hold the “Castle Ruin Tract” under the agreement made between him and the said John B. Milliken, assuming to act as Agent for the heirs of Edward P. Milliken, the said Joe Joiner having wholly failed to pay the agreed purchase money or any part thereof and that Plaintiff as Executor and as distributee of Mrs Ellen Barker, and his co-distributees are entitled to Judgment against the said Joe Joiner for the amount of said purchase money and interest and to an Order for sale of said premises as against said Joe Joiner, in satisfaction of the said Debt.
Signed in ink at right:
D. B. Gilliland
Plffs Atty.
Verification
A typewritten oath block with handwritten insertions:
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Charleston County
BEFORE ME PERSONALLY APPEARED THEODORE G. BARKER, who being duly sworn on oath says that the facts alleged in above Complaint of his own knowledge are true and such as stated on information, he believes them to be true.
SWORN to before me this fifteenth
… day of July A.D., 1890.
Signed in ink at right:
Theodore G. Barker
Below the date line at left, in ink:
W. Huger FitzSimons
Notary Public
S.C.
A small drawn ink “Seal” device appears at lower left.
AI Notes
The closing typewritten page of the legal complaint, with paragraph 15 alleging Joe Joiner’s failure to pay any part of the agreed purchase money for the Castle Ruin Tract, and seeking judgment and an order of sale against him. Signed in ink by D. B. Gilliland, Plaintiff’s Attorney — flowing cursive consistent with the same hand that signed the p178 summons cover. Below is a separate typewritten verification: ‘THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Charleston County,’ before whom personally appeared Theodore G. Barker, who being duly sworn states the facts in the Complaint are true. Sworn ‘fifteenth day of July A.D., 1890,’ signed by Theodore G. Barker as deponent and W. Huger FitzSimons, Notary Public S.C. A small wax/ink seal is drawn at lower left.
The action, brought 15 July 1890, pits the compiler’s great-uncle Theodore Gaillard Barker — Charleston attorney, former adjutant of Hampton’s Legion, and executor of his uncle John B. Milliken’s estate — against his own siblings and Milliken heirs, including his sister Susan M. FitzSimons (the compiler’s paternal grandmother). It is a routine partition-and-sale proceeding necessitated by the indivisible Castle Ruin and Ellery Tract; the family relationships are friendly, the lawsuit a legal formality. The notary, W. Huger FitzSimons, is Susan’s son and thus TGB’s nephew on the defendant side — a measure of how thoroughly the Barker and FitzSimons lines had interlocked by 1890.